Guided investigation · about 6 minutes
A six-minute paired investigation of Moneymore and Twin Falls: two catalogue records sharing a date and one publication issue, but requiring separate treatment.
Checkpoint 1
Capture its stable ID, place, date, and classifications before looking for similarities elsewhere. Shared dates are search clues, not evidence that records describe one event.
Checkpoint 2
Repeat the same extraction for Twin Falls. Preserve its own record ID and location so later comparison cannot silently merge the two catalogue rows.
Checkpoint 3
Open the records together and check their coordinate precision. A shared date does not erase geographic separation or uncertainty in either mapped point.
Checkpoint 4
Open the reviewed CSI New York page route for Moneymore and retain its record-specific context while noting the publication identity.
Checkpoint 5
The document ID matches the prior checkpoint because both routes reach the same publication issue. That shared container is provenance information—not permission to merge the catalogue records.
Checkpoint 6
Place both dossiers side by side. Keep distinct IDs, locations, source families, and citations visible even where date or publication context overlaps.
Interpretation boundary
Source-family counts describe archive coverage. Link-precision labels describe routing confidence. Neither substitutes for reading the scan, identifying dependence between publications, or evaluating a claim.